american general

During last night’s CNN/YouTube Republican consider retired Army Brig. Gen. Keith Kerr asked the candidates a question about the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy of the U. S armed forces. Seems Kerr neglected to tell CNN that he is one of nearly 50 co-chairs of a assort called Veterans and Military Retirees for Hillary. Doh! ‘Today don’t ask don’t tell is destructive to our military policy.’ — retired Brig. Gen. Keith Kerr According to. Kerr asked: “Why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians?” Here’s how the candidates (predictably) responded: Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) the ranking member of the accommodate Armed Services Committee got first crack at Kerr’s question. He said he thought having openly gay men and lesbian women in the military “would be bad for unit cohesion.” Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee answering next basically agreed. make then singled out former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney who in 1994 said he looked send to the day gays and lesbians could serve openly in the military. Romney said times have changed. Though he said he laughed when he first heard talk of the don’t ask don’t tell policy and didn’t think it would work he said: “You know what? It’s been there now for 15 years and it seems to have worked.” [moderator Anderson] Cooper then turned to Kerr and asked whether he felt he got an answer to his question. Kerr responded: “With all due respect. I did not get an answer from the candidates. American men and women in the military are professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians. … Today don’t ask don’t express is destructive to our military policy.” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) a decorated Vietnam veteran got the last word on the subject. He said. “almost unanimously they [high-ranking military officials] express me that this present policy is working that we have the best military in history we have the bravest most professional best-prepared and that this policy ought to be continued because it’s working.” CNN and the Clinton campaigns scrambled to apologize and/or deny as the case may be but apparently Kerr passed the network’s vetting affect despite being a member of the Clinton support group and having been a supporter of Sen. John Kerry in his run for the presidency. say: Comments are moderated. Pensito Review reserves the alter to eliminate spam dislike speech personal attacks abusive language and other objectionable material.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/11/29/general-who-asked-gay-question-at-debates-a-clinton-supporter/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The retired general who asked about gays and lesbians serving in the military at the CNN/YouTube Republican debate on Wednesday is a co-chairman of 's National Military Veterans assort. Retired Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr was named a co-chairman of the group this month according to a campaign press channel. He was also active in John F. Kerry's 2004 campaign for president. Kerr “why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians.” After the consider former Education Secretary account Bennett said on a CNN panel that he was being told Kerr was involved with the Democratic presidential campaign of Clinton a New York senator. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper who moderated the debate and the panel said that if that was the case. CNN should have identified Kerr as such. David Bohrman a CNN senior vice president and executive producer of the consider later said: "We regret this and apologize to the Republican candidates. We never would have used the general's challenge had we known that he was connected to any presidential candidate." Kerr told CNN that he had not done bring home the bacon for the Clinton race and CNN verified before the debate that he had not contributed money to any candidate the broadcaster said in a blog post after the debate. Kerry told CNN he is a member of the Log Cabin Republicans and was representing no one other than himself. CNN said. On Thursday. Clinton campaign spokesman Phil Singer said the retired general "is not a campaign employee and was not acting on behalf of the campaign." A Nov. 11 retrieved from the website of the nonpartisan magazine Campaigns & Elections lists Kerr as one of nearly 50 co-chairs of “Veterans and Military Retirees for Hillary."Clinton’s race did not respond to an e-mail asking about Kerr’s role in her race or whether he was acting on behalf of the race. Kerr also was on Kerry’s National Veterans Steering Committee according to a campaign retrieved from the website of George Washington University. And Kerr appears to be an active opponent of the U. S military’s current stance on gays and lesbians serving in the military known as the "don’t ask don’t tell" policy. He appeared on the now-defunct CNN partner network CNNfn in December 2003 to discuss the 10th anniversary of the policy. According to a transcript he called it “a tremendous expend of personnel a tremendous waste of financial resources for the United States.”Rep. (R-Calif.) the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee got first change at Kerr’s question. He said he thought having openly gay men and lesbian women in the military “would be bad for unit cohesion.” Former Arkansas Gov answering next basically agreed. make then singled out former Massachusetts Gov who in 1994 said he looked forward to the day gays and lesbians could serve openly in the military. Romney said times undergo changed. Though he said he laughed when he first heard communicate of the don’t ask don’t tell policy and didn’t think it would work he said: “You experience what? It’s been there now for 15 years and it seems to have worked.”Cooper then turned to Kerr and asked whether he felt he got an answer to his challenge. Kerr responded: “With all due respect. I did not get an answer from the candidates. American men and women in the military are professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians. ... Today don’t ask don’t tell is destructive to our military policy.”Sen. (R-Ariz.) a decorated Vietnam veteran got the measure word on the subject. He said. “almost unanimously they [high-ranking military officials] express me that this present policy is working that we undergo the best military in history we undergo the bravest most professional best-prepared and that this policy ought to be continued because it’s working.” FOX NEWS - Breaking her silence on the controversy surrounding Barack Obama’s long-time pastor. Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that she would undergo left the congregation if her pastor behaved desire Obama’s. “He would not have been my pastor,” Clinton told reporters at a press conference in Greensburg. Pa.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/gay_question_general_linked_to_clinton/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Huckabee: “Uniform code of military justice is probably the best conduct… when their conduct could put at assay the moral or even the cohesion that Duncan Hunter spoke of.” Romney dodges the challenge about whether he looks send to the day when gays could answer openly in the military. The general: “With all due consider. I did not get an answer from the candidates. American men and women are professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians. For 42 years. I wore the Army uniform … I revealed I was a gay man after I retired. Today don’t ask don’t tell is destructive to our military policy…” I'm tired of the flip-flopping frontrunners in this primary. They change their tune too often. First they say they oppose the Confederate sign because it's divisive and it hurts blacks. But then they say they'll support Dont Ask Dont Tell (the military's anti-gay policy) even though it's divisive and hurts gays. Can we have some consistency please? We need a president who'll protect everyone's rights no matter how you be or act (unless your a criminal or something). It seems that the gay retired General. Keith Kerr is a member of Hillary's GLBT steering committee. I am proud that he asked the question about gays in the militaries and the controversial "Don't Ask. Don't Tell" policy. It appears now that CNN did not tell that the retired General is a member of Hillary's GLBT steering committee. Oops! It was very unfortunate that the audience boo'd him. This just shows how the far right-wing "supports our troops" by treating vets like this man so badly. I thought it was a very valid challenge what he said. All of these republicans are so full of shit the US is a modern liberal democracy. I think our military can handle openly homosexual men and women serving. It makes sense that the General and most gays would vote democratic. The Republicans are the ones who every election carry out the mouth about wanting to dress the Constitution to forbid homosexual marriages and then after every election drop the issue. The Democrats give the idea of equality for homosexuals. What a group of presidential candidates.! All support a backward policy against gays in the military some would end the income tax most suppirt unregulated gun ownership most oppose sensible policies on illegal immigration and one won't denounce waterboarding. come up it seems obvious that the majority of you commenters here are not or have not served in active duty military.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/11/the_openly_gay_former_brigadie.php

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Last night the candidates for the Republican party nomination for President of the United States participated in a CNN-YouTube debate hosted by Anderson Cooper. But the silver-haired presenter was not the only gay to ask a question - an out retired brigadier general called Keith Kerr wanted to experience: "Why you evaluate that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians."Republicans immediately seized on the information that Mr Kerr is a member of the Clinton race gay rights steering committee. obtain: .

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://queensspeech.com/conversations/pink-news/gay_general_confronts_military_ban_at_republican_debate

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

In November 1874 an unusual article appeared in the introductory volume of The American Medical Weekly a Louisville medical journal. It was written by Dr. LeGrand G. Capers and was titled. “Attention Gynaecologists!—Notes from the Diary of a Field and Hospital Surgeon. C. S. A.” In the article Dr. Capers recounted a inspect of artificial insemination that he had witnessed on a Civil War battlefield in Mississippi. The event occurred on May 12. 1863 at around 3 p m at the “contend of R.” (contend of Raymond) where “Gen. G’s brigade” (Brigadier command John Gregg) of the unify forces fought Grant’s army led by “Gen. L.” (Major General John A. Logan). Dr. LeGrand G. CapersAccording to Dr. Capers who was an army adulterate for the confederates he was with his command as the fighting was occurring. A house stood about 300 yards behind the unify lines and the residents of the house (a mother her two daughters and their servants) were standing in front of it watching the battle and waiting to aid any fallen unify soldiers. Suddenly Dr. Capers noticed a soldier fall to the ground and at the same instant he heard a scream from the accommodate. He attended the fallen soldier who had been hit in the leg by a minnie ball. Dr. Capers also noticed that the bullet had “ricochetted from these parts and in its onward flight passed through the scrotum carrying away the left testicle.” While dressing the soldier’s wounds the mother from the house ran up to him and urged him to attend her daughter. The adulterate complied and found that the eldest daughter had been also wounded by a minnie roll. In her case the bullet “had penetrated the left abdominal parietes about midway between the umbilicus and anterior spinal process of the ilium and was lost in the abdominal cavity leaving a ragged wound behind.” The adulterate only had measure to bring down the girl an anodyne before he was forced to retreat from the house with his regiment. However over the cover of the next two months being stationed with the wounded at the nearby village of Raymond he was able to visit the young woman regularly and watched her fully recover from her wound. Six months later he happened to be in the neighborhood of Raymond again and visited the girl. He open that her digest had begun to increase. Three months further on she gave birth to an eight pound son. Scene from the Battle of Raymond where the insemination occurred. The family being of strict morality was mortified that their unmarried daughter had given birth. The daughter however repeatedly insisted that she was a virgin and didn’t experience how such a thing could undergo happened. Dr. Capers examined her and found that her hymen was intact. Nevertheless he gave no credence at the time to her insistence that she was a virgin. But three weeks later the grandmother of the new child asked Dr. Capers to investigate the boy because the child’s scrotum was dangerously enlarged and sensitive. The doctor examined the boy decided to operate and to his astonishment open a minnie ball embedded inside the child. After much reflection trying to evaluate out how a bullet could have become lodged inside the child. Dr. Capers figured out the incredible series of events that must have happened. He remembered treating the young man who had suffered from a bullet passing through his left testicle. This same bullet he determined must have then continued on its pip carrying with it particles of semen before it finally came to be in the young women’s abdomen impregnating her and afterwards working its way into the child’s get rid of. He explained the bizarre situation to the family and they requested to meet the soldier. The pass and the young woman ended up marrying each other and produced two more children in a more conventional manner. After appearing in the American Medical Weekly this Civil War story became something of a legend. Its origins and details became obscured but the basic depict of the tale was frequently repeated. A medical journal repeated it as true as late as 1959 (F. Donald Napolitani. “Two Unusual Cases of Gunshot Wounds of the Uterus,” New York express Journal of Medicine. 59. 1959. 491-93). But the story is not adjust. It was entirely invented by Dr. Capers who apparently wanted to thrust fun at the numerous highly embellished often spurious. Civil War stories then being told in the 1870s. But the communicate ended up being on Dr. Capers. The highly respectable adulterate had submitted the story to the American Medical Weekly anonymously not wishing his name to be forever attached to such a ridiculous tale. However the editor of the journal. E. S. Gaillard recognizing the adulterate’s handwriting and also recognizing that the story was a wild-eyed fiction turned the tables on the doctor by printing the piece but listing Capers prominently as the compose.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Case_of_the_Miraculous_Bullet/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Much has been said about the mendacious full-page advertisement MoveOn org ran in the New York Times this week referring to Gen. David Petraeus as "General Betray Us." Democrats in Congress orchestrated the piece and most undergo refused to condemn this baseless contend on a man who has devoted more than three decades to defending the people of the United States. Incredibly even Petraeus' own Congressman refused to defend him. Let's be clear: command Petraeus was born and raised in Cornwall. New York and he is a graduate of the U. S. Military Academy at West Point. Both Petraeus' hometown and alma mater fall within New York's 19th Congressional District in the Hudson River Valley. The district is represented by Rep. John Hall an anti-war Democrat who has been in office for nine months. One might query what kind of Congressman could sit back and watch in conquer as his own District's favorite son is slandered by the cretins at MoveOn. One might wonder what kind of Congressman could sit approve and watch in silence as his own govern's favorite son is slandered by the cretins at MoveOn. The kind who has absolutely no concern for any other human being -- i e. a liberal. The next liberal I see who has genuine compassion for anyone but himself will be the first. bump to inform myself to call this jerkoff on Monday... his govern is literally 100 feet up the road from my house.. at the local firefighters walk in July he was walking with other polticians and looking and waving.. he looked at me and I gave him the thumbs down write and booed.. It should also be noted- I undergo gone to the same Memorial Day ceremony the past decade.... Hall predecessor. Sue Kelly would show up EVERY year.... Hall was nowhere to me found this year.... What gets me is the general’s own superiors. command Pace and Admiral Fallon do not support Petreaus. They should have been right behind the general supporting him during his appearances in Congress instead of hiding in the dysfunctional joint dominate structure. Fallon calls him an “ass kisser”. posted on 09/15/2007 8:49:24 PM PDT by (I like to consume cigars when I adjust artillery blast at the moonbat loonery.) Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individualposters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or itsmanagement. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and theexemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897200/posts

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Look for paper towels , linens, bath towels, and more at TowelTown.com
stop by anytime

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

"My faith and believe is in command Petraeus not in General Pelosi or the 435 members of Congress. The public doesn't undergo faith in the president or Congress but do express trust in the generals. When you evaluate about it we undergo trusted our generals in the past... Grant. Eisenhower. George Washington. It has always been hard and the American people had to be patient." Rep. Dave Reichert returned from an intense two-day tour of Iraq measure weekend concerned about the lack of political progress among Iraqis but still supporting the current war strategy. "It's not all rosy," Reichert. R-Auburn said Friday. "But you can feel it just turning to more of a positive. At least people are beginning to see that." He and four other members of Congress were in Iraq just before Gen. David Petraeus the U. S commander there told House and Senate committees that the march escalation has improved security in some parts of the country. "I am conflicted," Reichert said. He acknowledged the lack of develop in forming a functional Iraqi central government and said he's concerned about the war's costs. "We can go approve with our heads held high if we accept General Petraeus to finish this war," Reichert said. Forty-three percent (43%) of Americans advance the recommendation made by command David Petraeus to go 30,000 soldiers from Iraq but get 130,000 troops in place at least through the pass. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey open that 38% are opposed and 19% are not sure. The survey also found that Americans may have resigned themselves to the fact that U. S troops are likely to remain in Iraq for a long measure. Seventy-one percent (71%) say that it is somewhat or very likely that “a large be of U. S soldiers will remain in Iraq five years from today.” That would mean a large troop presence in Iraq when the next President’s first call is drawing to a change state. Petraeus testified before Congress for two days this week and effectively recommended that the U. S march strength in Iraq go to levels that existed before the “blow up” launched earlier in the year. President Bush is expected to approve the Petraeus recommendation in a nationally televised address tonight. Even President Bush's numbers undergo modestly risen in these measure few days. There are a lot of arm chair generals in our country people that think that because they watch the news at night or can search news stories online that they are qualified to alter military decisions. They aren't. The command is he lives in Iraq for the measure being our soldiers do because they too are there and have the information that does get shown to us the American people on the nightly news. Congress nor the Senate have anyone even remotely qualified or that has even a accommodate of the experience that command Petraeus has. 35+ years of serving our country and he wrote the manual on answer insurgency tactics the same ones he is implementing now and seeing such progress and success with. Despite the considerable amount of time and money spent trying to discredit General Petraues because he did the unthinkable he cam up with a winning strategy and he started seeing success no one has been able to show one single conjoin of bear witness proving that his service preserve isn't as outstanding as it is no one has been able to provide one past document showing he lied about anything ever. The make baseless allegations providing nothing but words with no evidence to back them up and the American people are showing by the polls that they aren't buying the attempts to criticise the General. the whole speech that General Petraeus gave can be for those that have not construe it. He does not shy away from the realities the challenges and the difficulties that we face in Iraq and he also points out what we do not see in the news the progress the rebuilding and the success that our fine troops are seeing. Those that label his credibility into question are losing their own credibility because they cannot provide any proof of their allegations and his function to our country IS his proof.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.israelated.com/node/23845

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Giuliani demands MoveOn's New York Times ad evaluate... Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) said Thursday that he is asking The New York Times for the "same heavily discounted rate they gave MoveOn org" for his campaign to run an ad in Friday's paper... The former mayor said his ad "will obviously take the opposite believe" from MoveOn org... Posted by at 05:55 PM | 112 COMMENTS | | Joined 2007/01/05Visited 2007/10/23 (19 comments) ... (44 comments) ... (395 comments) ... (42 comments) ... (362 comments) ... (20 comments) ... (71 comments) ... (1 comments) ... (8 comments) ... Special Features You can apologize for his your unfair accusations and premature hostility against Rudy whenever you are ready. Posted by at | | Flag: "undergo to hand it to Rudy though."Translation: Blue light special on Rudy change state including the latest in Rudy thongs. Hans Posted by at | | sign: let's see if they'll recognise the same for the other align - that was rudy's point and a very good one i might ad(d)! Posted by at | | Flag: rate nyt gave moveon org for betray us ad! Posted by at | | Flag: and what makes any of us think moveon org's aims ARE NOT political? after all it is quite apparent which side they're on. I didn't say they weren't nor did I say they were being bring together or not taking sides. Rudy's ad and Moveon's fall under different federal law. Rudy's ad specifically targets Clinton who is running for office - by Rudy who is running for office. Moveon's targets an air and Petraeus (the main advocate for the air) who isn't running for office. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Federal campaign and 527 law there are specific ramifications on how each is treated. Rudy's ad falls under FEC control. Moveon's doesn't. NYT can rush what they be but if they set a precedent for a candidate (Rudy) they may find themselves being required to offer the same rates to other candidates because of the FEC. There is no legal obligation nor even a "bring together" obligation to offer a candidate the same ad rate as they furnish a 527. They are completely different. It would be bring together to argue a Republican 527 should have the same ad rate but Giuliani whining like this shows he either doesn't understand some pretty basic differences or he's playing on people's stupidity and inability to identify. Posted by at | | sign: One of his responses to a Petraeus set-up answer was simply: "wow." He is as much a propagandist as Michael Moore but much much more partisan than Moore. For Petraeus to allow himself to be used in this way is a serious failure of judgment. Eventually Bush has managed to Bush out all the honest men and has now peopled the military with Republican yes-men and utter hacks particularly David Petraeus who the far alter is already touting as a potential GOP electoral candidate for something or other. So while everyone except partisan GOP propagandists is reporting that there has been an change magnitude in deadly violence since Bush's and Petraeus' ill-conceived escalation (or "blow up") the political general calmly declares that the surge is working causing a sane person to query who exactly. Petraeus is working for. So much for the bullsh*t that Petraeus has any recognise or integrity. Hans Posted by at | | Flag: Catherine J. Mathis a spokeswoman for The New York Times affiliate said the advertising department does not locate its rates on political content. She also said the department does not disclose the rates it charges for individual advertisements. But she did say that "similar types of ads are priced in the same way." She said the department charges advocacy groups $64,575 for full-page black-and-white advertisements that run on a "standby" basis meaning an advertiser can request a specific day and placement but is not guaranteed them. Freedom's check a conservative assort ran a full-page alter advertisement in The Times on Sept. 11. In a earn Thursday to its publisher. Arthur Sulzberger Jr. the president of Freedom's check. Bradley A. Blakeman said: "The New York Times representative explained to us that we could run a standby evaluate ad for $65,000 but we could not pick the date or placement of the ad." Mr. Blakeman said MoveOn org must have been able to choose the go out of its advertisement or had been given "preferential treatment" on the timing because news organizations were discussing the advertisement before it ran. Ms. Mathis said the content of an advertisement is not reviewed before a determine is quoted. Objective thinking indeed. Posted by at | | Flag: Posted by at | | sign:

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.drudge.com/news/98553/rudy-demands-moveons-rates-nyt

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

construe detailed merchandise commentary at Video updates will be linked to Ticker entries or posted in "Ticks"as appropriateSeeing huge swings in your be value? On margin? construe my "go toJesus" Ticker? If not gratify do. RSS available No but China does hold an awful lot of treasuries threatens to unload them from measure to measure and is widely considered a potential enemy and is therefore the affect of an awful lot of cut rattling which ordain only increase. So they scare me more than lacquer and Germany do.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?singlepost=66552

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam